Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Aldermen getting cold feet over ambulance rates

After realizing how truly absurd and potentially tragic it would be to begin charging more than double the current rate for ambulance service, councilmen started going limp on the idea this week.

God knows there are people in other communities, like Cherry Valley, who pay less taxes and get their ambulance service for free. That's what a mall can do for ya', and Rockford missed the boat there. Oh well.

Kudos to Pat Curran, however, for trying to do something about it. At last week's city council meeting, Curran encouraged colleagues to participate in a budget discussion during a special committee meeting, set for two hours before Monday's council meeting so as not to interfere with other committee schedules.

Nancy Johnson was the only other Finance & Personnel Committee member to show up on time, so hats off to her as well. I would be remiss if I didn't throw Carl Wasco, Frank Beach and Jeff Holt high-fives for giving a shit, too, but their interest was in vain.

Unfortunately, according to my sources, Curran and Johnson's presence wasn't enough to constitute a quorum, so these aldermen, along with interested citizens, the press and about a dozen staffers and administrators (who are paid by taxpayers for their time), sat twiddling their thumbs for an hour before Doug Mark graced everyone with his presence so the party could begin.

I guess his employer, the Metrocentre, doesn't feel the city's millions in contributions warrant letting an alderman work on city business. By the time Mark arrived, the non-F&P members had to leave for their own committee meetings, so the whole purpose of meeting at 4 was a complete wash. I'll bet Curran was pissed, and rightly so. But hey, at least Mark showed up.

From what I've been told, Vic Bell and Linda McNeely (also F&P Committee members) apparently had better things to do than discuss how they're gonna get out of the $8,000,000 mess they helped put the city in. No kudos or high-fives for these two, only bitch-slaps. McNeely is only around to be a pain in Larry's ass (probably on behalf of Doug Scott and/or Charles Box), and Bell is a short-timer, so what do they care? They apparently don't.

By the way, Ann Thompson didn't even set foot in city hall Monday. Probably a bad eyebrow day. Jesus, what a horror show.

Anyway, not surprisingly, I'm guessing little or nothing was accomplished during the committee meeting, because nothing was accomplished at city council either.

I'm getting the feeling most aldermen would rather keep putting this off and go to their little caucus-orgies on Monday nights instead. After Mr. Sammul prattled on forever about the dry nuances of ambulance costs, councilmen seemed to have had enough for one night.

Two weeks before the drop-dead date to pass a budget, none of them felt like talking about it, so they just put it off for yet another week. They claimed they wanted more time to review the "new" information, but they really just needed a fucking drink.

For that, I can't blame them, but maybe Patrick Hayes should draft a new council rule to allow bar service in chambers. I'm not sure that even tea-totaler Beach could resist the thought of Julia Valdez reaching blackout-point, taking on her true black widow persona in some sort of ritualistic dance on the mayor's desk. I won't even get into the Tijuana performance I imagine her putting on with the gavel. You don't wanna know.

At any rate, Curran was the only alderman with the balls to essentially say, "Hey, doubling ambulance charges just isn't right if all we're gonna get is happy fire fighters and a few re-elected aldermen."

By the time the council is done with them, IAFF local 413 may realize they have a premature ejaculation problem once aldermen come to the realization they just don't have the luxury of putting four brave souls on every engine right now. Now the union is stuck with Doug Block.

Even if the city were to solve the budget crunch and wind up with some huge hypothetical surplus, you'd better believe Morrissey will cut crews now, no matter what. Why? 'Cause it makes more sense to spend the money on something we truly need. Oh yeah, and I suppose going against Larry didn't help their cause either. Block may have peaked too early as well, but we'll see.

I love, respect and admire our men and women who rush to our aid on our blackest days, but c'mon...We do NOT need 4 of you on every fire truck when multiple companies can readily respond. Regardless of EJ Dilonardo's propaganda, 3 fire fighters is the norm. Do your research. I did. The only people who buy into this 4-man nonsense are the ones who've never been outside of Rockford.

Between having to shitcan his buddy Adam Smith and having fire fighters endorse Block, Larry had a hard week, but I expect he'll bounce back before election day. Block has a clear edge at the moment, and plenty more opportunities to criticize the administration, but three weeks is an eternity during a campaign. Anything can happen.

C'mon, people, this is gonna be fun to watch, one way or another! Pour some scotch, spark a fattie and watch the show.

With their boy Block posing a serious threat now, I suspect Democrats will dig their heels in on the 4-man issue, but I think Republicans (who don't really have a dog in the fight) will side with Morrissey. Afterall, to them, an independent is better than a Democrat.

P.S.
Your prayers for Jim Powers and his family would be appreciated. Lord knows I haven't always agreed with him, but I've never doubted his integrity or his love for the Forest City. Thanks for your service, Colonel. It is appreciated. God bless.

3 comments:

  1. Any chance the Alderman are going to par their stipend in solidarity with the city workers?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spade,by law,as elected officials,Council members and the mayor cannot change their wages,neither raise nor lower. Any changes would not take effect till the next(not this upcoming)election. Though some have talked of some type of voluntary "payback",hard to determine if it's merely political posturing.
    And Raoul,I admire your straight-shooter style,however,as LarryBoy has FRAMED the discussion with mere staffing numbers,IMHO,there's more untold...
    My research:
    Aurora: 9 stations,responding to 16,000 calls,covering 33 square miles
    Joliet: 9 stations,responding to 18,000 calls,covering 28 square miles
    Rockford: 11 stations,responding to 22,000 calls,covering 56 square miles....
    IF the city added maybe 3-4 stations, to give the same coverage per square mile,the number game would be MEANINGFUL...
    (and though there seems to be no budget links for Joliet,I find this also interest...
    Aurora Mayor's Office Budget...$680,000
    Rockford...$980,000
    Aurora Law Dept. Budget...$420,000
    Rockford's Legal Dept.....$2,000,000



    That's another perspective,eh?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spade,by law,as elected officials,Council members and the mayor cannot change their wages,neither raise nor lower. Any changes would not take effect till the next(not this upcoming)election. Though some have talked of some type of voluntary "payback",hard to determine if it's merely political posturing.
    And Raoul,I admire your straight-shooter style,however,as LarryBoy has FRAMED the discussion with mere staffing numbers,IMHO,there's more untold...
    My research:
    Aurora: 9 stations,responding to 16,000 calls,covering 33 square miles
    Joliet: 9 stations,responding to 18,000 calls,covering 28 square miles
    Rockford: 11 stations,responding to 22,000 calls,covering 56 square miles....
    IF the city added maybe 3-4 stations, to give the same coverage per square mile,the number game would be MEANINGFUL...
    (and though there seems to be no budget links for Joliet,I find this also interest...
    Aurora Mayor's Office Budget...$680,000
    Rockford...$980,000
    Aurora Law Dept. Budget...$420,000
    Rockford's Legal Dept.....$2,000,000



    That's another perspective,eh?

    ReplyDelete